It's clearly too much to ask that our judiciary be science aware, but it should not be unreasonable to demand that they not be science adverse. One of the consequences of having religious fundamentalists as judges is that they consistently rule contrary to scientifically sound positions. Could it be part of their power trip?
I neglected to mention the recent Union of Concerned Scientists report on the massive crimes of the Tysons Food [sic] conglomerate? Here it is: https://act.ucsusa.org/sp-24-Tyson
It's clearly too much to ask that our judiciary be science aware, but it should not be unreasonable to demand that they not be science adverse. One of the consequences of having religious fundamentalists as judges is that they consistently rule contrary to scientifically sound positions. Could it be part of their power trip?
I neglected to mention the recent Union of Concerned Scientists report on the massive crimes of the Tysons Food [sic] conglomerate? Here it is: https://act.ucsusa.org/sp-24-Tyson
Where is the discussion on data centers? This writing and analysis is second grade IMHO.